In case there is any confusion on what happened last night on the reviewed goal — and I know there was on my end — the ref told the video review judge that he did not signal “no goal” but that he blew the whistle and moved his arms to signify a stoppage. Then, a review clearly showed the puck in the net. The question is, what would have happened if the ref said he DID signal no goal? Could they review the timing of the whistle? That’s still not totally known. Crazy goal…still lots of debate.
Players and coaches are meeting now, after which there is media availability, so stay tuned…
Rules for Blog Commenting
Repeated violations of the blog rules will result in site bans, commensurate with the nature and number of offenses.
Please flag any comments that violate the site rules for moderation. For immediate problems regarding problematic posts, please email zdooley@lakings.com.