The Kings will get at least one point, but so will the Bruins, in a game they trailed 3-0. The Bruins outshot the Kings 17-8 in the third period and 39-25 in regulation.
LATEST NEWS- The Key Three: May 22
- Los Angeles is Kings of the road
- Kings' success brings back memories of 1993
- Can anyone stop the Kings?
- Kings' run evokes memories of '93 for broadcasters
- Kings await Rangers or Devils in Stanley Cup Final
- Kings, Coyotes differ sharply on Brown's hit
- Penner's overtime winner caps personal turnabout
- Live Chat: Western Conference Final
- TV and Radio - Tonight
RULES FOR BLOG COMMENTING
- No profanity, slurs or other offensive language. Replacing letters with symbols does not turn expletives into non-expletives.
- Personal attacks against other blog commenters, and/or blatant attempts to antagonize other commenters, are not tolerated. Respectful disagreement is encouraged. Posts that continually express the same singular opinion will be deleted.
- Comments that incite political, religious or similar debates will be deleted.
- Please do not discuss, or post links to, websites that illegally stream NHL games.
- Posting under multiple user names is not allowed. Do not type in all caps. All violations are subject to comment deletion and/or banning of commenters, per the discretion of the blog administrator.
SOCIAL MEDIA
LA Kings Insider LA Kings Official
Boy, does it feel like we go into overtime losing by a score of 3-3.
[Reply]
cjms Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:34 pm
@Mel Powell, Very lucky to salvage a point.
[Reply]
What's the frequency, Kenneth? Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:35 pm
@Mel Powell, Sooner or later they have to catch a break…they played well enough in the third to deserve a break.
[Reply]
Simmer Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:40 pm
The Bruins, you mean? Or maybe you were watching the Flyers game?
[Reply]
What's the frequency, Kenneth? Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:42 pm
WAT
I just want to state that the Kings PP is pathetic. Why were we giving up shots to the Bruins? There should be no way for them to be getting that much room to move.
The Kings last year had a better power play and were getting more shots on goal last year. The Kings are passing way too much, and not taking shots.
Jamie Kompon needs to be relieved of his duties as the PP coach.
[Reply]
Give them credit for playing hard in overtime–both teams want that 2nd point aren’t overly concerned about the other team getting it.
[Reply]
How many games do we have to lose because of our disgusting, bantam level power play, before Jamie Kompon gets replaced. The guy simply doesn’t know what he’s doing, and our DISGUSTING powerplay constantly loses us momentum, every single time. Every game this guy stands behind the bench, tells me that management still doesn’t ever feel the urgency to ice a better hockey team.
[Reply]
What's the frequency, Kenneth? Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:43 pm
@nyck, Yup, gonna have to say the power play sucks. Unlike some, I’m not gonna get hyperbolic and say everything sucks, but the PP seems to suffer from the same lack of “push” the 5-on-5 play does.
[Reply]
hockey junkie Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:46 pm
@nyck, last year we couldn’t get a 5 on 5 goal if we paid for one…so this yr we are having trouble the pp goal. Can’t wait till we can score on both pp and 5 on 5. We will be wicked good!
[Reply]
Did someone go Zebra hunting?
[Reply]
Hate to see any kind of an injury, but the Kings could certainly use the breather.
[Reply]
why the heck are we are using the umbrella powerplay so much??? Crash the net, shoot the puck, maybe a couple passes is fine, how hard is that??
[Reply]
Mesquite Smokie Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:43 pm
@Kings Fan in Temecula,
Very true.
[Reply]
Mesquite Smokie Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:44 pm
@Kings Fan in Temecula,
The PP should be set up and not require 16 passes before one shot.. it should be one-two shoot, one-two shoot. The goals do not need to be pretty.
[Reply]
Are teams now purposely scuffing the Zamboni blade or something?
[Reply]
Time for a shoootoooooot
[Reply]
I guess now we find out if the lack of mojo is going to affect the freak show in addition to the real hockey.
[Reply]
Kings playing not to lose. Not playing to win.
[Reply]
somebody try a slapshot for a change.
[Reply]
However this game turns out we blew it big time. Should never have gone to overtime.
[Reply]
hockey junkie Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:54 pm
@Daren,
taking 2 pts and happy!
[Reply]
too basic for kopitar.
[Reply]
JJ tried to hard.
[Reply]
There are ruts in the ice, right?
[Reply]
Mesquite Smokie Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:50 pm
@cjms,
Not in the middle. It got cleaned.
[Reply]
Brownie just made one too many moves.
[Reply]
Looks like it’s more bad shooting than good goaltending, but a little of each.
[Reply]
Stoll was way to simple.
[Reply]
Battle for best goalie in the league
[Reply]
handsus….do it !
[Reply]
zuessssssssssssssssssssssssss!
[Reply]
ZZZZZZZZZZUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!
[Reply]
Miracles happen! Guess the mojo didn’t get Quicker.
[Reply]
What's the frequency, Kenneth? Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:53 pm
Have to consider him the number one star.
[Reply]
hockey junkie Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:55 pm
@What’s the frequency, Kenneth?,
or Zues
[Reply]
What's the frequency, Kenneth? Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:54 pm
My money would have been on Williams scoring the winner.
[Reply]
Daren Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:57 pm
@What’s the frequency, Kenneth?, No kidding…Williams is our best player (non-goalie) this season hands down.
[Reply]
wow. took ‘zus to win it. This game should have never gone to OT.
[Reply]
puck73 Reply:
November 20th, 2010 at 6:54 pm
@Mesquite Smokie, Exactly, fire Kompon. Just because the Kings won dont expect a lot of Kings fans to forgiving of Jamie.
[Reply]
I can finally breathe..
[Reply]
Oh my god! Deserved?? Hahaha! Well done, Zues!
[Reply]
The newly introduced term from the TM era is apropos at the moment. The Kings COMPETE level is sucking hard!! They had more heart when they were considered the underdog. Lose the swagger, boys. But I still love you!! GKG!
[Reply]