Comments on: Thursday's new lines

By: KingArcticFox

KingArcticFox — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 19:48:00 +0000

So whats the 4th line gonna look like? Obvi Purcell is back in but what about the rest of the line?? Even you ivanans fans got to agree he shouldnt be in there against a team as skilled as DET

By: The Jumping Shrimp

The Jumping Shrimp — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:30:47 +0000

Just so you know what you’re dealing with, BadGoltending is the same guy who said Ivanans is better than Purcell. I’m starting to think he’s got something personal against Purcell. I’d say Teddy stole his lunch money and beat him up as a kid and he thinks this is payback.

JayMiller

Parse is the whipping boy? Who just came back into the lineup after being nine games as a healthy scratch? WTF do you guys come up with this crap? It’s mindblowing.

For guys like Jay Miller and BadGoltending. Get behind the team and it’s players and stop whining so much about Purcell. True Kings fans want everyone on the team to play well as that generally translates into wins.

This is what it boils down to.

Purcell played well against Buffalo. He set up a bunch of guys with point blank scoring chances and you two are still here today flappin’ your gums about how terrible he is.

Unbelievable!

Answer me one question. Did you guys even watch the game last night?

By: - ViC -

- ViC - — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:56:18 +0000

Ehh I don’t know about that. I wouldn’t say its a nobrainer.There both learning how to play big and getting better.

By: badGoltending

badGoltending — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:35:52 +0000

parse over purcell is a nobrainer

the kind of decision that makes you say “Purcell,who?”

He’s a hazard like road blocks and spike strips on a freeway during rush hour traffic.

By: badGoltending

badGoltending — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:32:03 +0000

please lets all give praise where praise is do.

scott parse deserves to be on the L.a kings and in the nHL.

TEDDY purcell is not NhL ready or able to play in game situations.
at least not yet; plain and simple

i dont want to have or watch teddy purcell play the way that he plays, he’s a hazard.

can we all come to an agreement on that?

By: Crashin' Da Net

Crashin' Da Net — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 06:12:28 +0000

Purcell showed so much promise early on and I have no doubt he still can prove his worth but right, we need help. Parse is proving himself each and every game. He is consistent. He deserves to play more then TP. I hope this is a very very limited effort to perhaps showcase Purcell for something or read him the riot act and sending him back down if need be. He is not physical enough.

By: Dominick

Dominick — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:52:24 +0000

I don’t see Parse as being in the Dog house.Purcell is the one who has sat for the last 9 games.Purcell is the one who for all intents and pourposes is supposed to be in that situation.Purcell is a skill guy(personal evaluations excluded)who is supposed to score.TM probably felt he’d play those situations better.Parse missed a few lets change it up.Maybe he’s sending a message,but I don’t think its anything major.

By: uknojata

uknojata — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:14:56 +0000

“I thought Purcell would be the guy who, if he gets that look, he’s going to finish.”

What is Terry talking about?!! Purcell has 3 goals in 38 games. This guy couldn’t finish a chicken sandwich. I feel like I’m taking crazy pills!!!

By: Luc20Rules

Luc20Rules — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:57:05 +0000

I agree with RoyalPain TM hasn’t sat Parse for 9 games as a healthy scratch. The only potential dog house move was senting him to Manchester for 2 Monarch games which was only 1 missed Kings Game. I think he was just trying to amp up Teddy’s confidence. I wouldn’t be at all suprised if he explained what he was doing to Parse before or after the comments.

By: RoyalPain

RoyalPain — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:35:37 +0000

I think TM already belives that Parse will be good, so he needs to thoroughly check out Purcell so he can make up his mind about him either way.