<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murray postgame quotes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lakingsinsider.com/2009/11/11/murray-postgame-quotes-11/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lakingsinsider.com/2009/11/11/murray-postgame-quotes-11/</link>
	<description>In-depth coverage of the Los Angeles Kings.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 14:52:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: What's the frequency, Kenneth?</title>
		<link>http://lakingsinsider.com/2009/11/11/murray-postgame-quotes-11/#comment-11870</link>
		<dc:creator>What's the frequency, Kenneth?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 09:07:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakingsinsider.com/?p=1367#comment-11870</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because he DIDN&#039;T play a great game, Anthony.  He played well enough not to lose because he got enough support.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because he DIDN&#8217;T play a great game, Anthony.  He played well enough not to lose because he got enough support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KellyHrudey</title>
		<link>http://lakingsinsider.com/2009/11/11/murray-postgame-quotes-11/#comment-11869</link>
		<dc:creator>KellyHrudey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakingsinsider.com/?p=1367#comment-11869</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s baaacckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s baaacckkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anthony</title>
		<link>http://lakingsinsider.com/2009/11/11/murray-postgame-quotes-11/#comment-11868</link>
		<dc:creator>anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:10:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakingsinsider.com/?p=1367#comment-11868</guid>
		<description>Wow TM, way to support your back-up goaltender.
	Won&#039;t even admit that Ersberg played a great game. Instead, the defense bailed him out by blocking shots.
	I feel bad for Ersberg and Bernier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow TM, way to support your back-up goaltender.<br />
	Won&#8217;t even admit that Ersberg played a great game. Instead, the defense bailed him out by blocking shots.<br />
	I feel bad for Ersberg and Bernier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kings fan in dallas</title>
		<link>http://lakingsinsider.com/2009/11/11/murray-postgame-quotes-11/#comment-11867</link>
		<dc:creator>kings fan in dallas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 05:54:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakingsinsider.com/?p=1367#comment-11867</guid>
		<description>Off topic...good job inbetween periods richey..you might have found your next career..just dont ever close this site</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic&#8230;good job inbetween periods richey..you might have found your next career..just dont ever close this site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynic</title>
		<link>http://lakingsinsider.com/2009/11/11/murray-postgame-quotes-11/#comment-11866</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 04:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lakingsinsider.com/?p=1367#comment-11866</guid>
		<description>Now the question Macdup asked in the last thread: Did EE play good enough to play against ATL?

	I say &#039;Not really&#039;, but you start him anyway. With Kovalchuk most likely in the lineup, I&#039;m sketchy on starting Ersberg. Quick would be better against him, but I&#039;d DEFINITELY prefer Quick against Tampa Bay. EE should play by default on Friday IMHO.

	SO Rich, I thought the Fro issues had died down. Apparantely not. Matthew Barry made some references to trade talk (Which I won&#039;t mention because I have no clue if they are legit or not) with Fro that was nixed because the other team wanted a #1. I&#039;m not looking for confirmation on that or anything, but I am beginning to wonder if things are heating up. Foxy spoke about Fro last week as comments were dying down (Rightfully so), You and Foxy (Who looked like he was standing on a box next to you) tonight bring up the talk again. I almost want to get this all over with early so it doesn&#039;t affect us close to playoff time. It&#039;s almost annoying at this point.

	As far as who should go, Martinez back to Manch when off IR. I&#039;d trade Purcell and bring up Clune. Harrold can sit until needed. I&#039;m just not seeing anything out of Purcell at all. Almost every time he drives, he&#039;s knocked off the puck. I&#039;m not seeing the skill as advertised. His dad&#039;s moustache is rockin&#039;, but it doesn&#039;t score goals. If we keep him all year, he&#039;ll end up like Moulson, released for nothing. We can&#039;t send him back down and at this point, why would we. He&#039;s just not cutting it. I&#039;d like Terry Murray&#039;s opinion on Purcell&#039;s play so far this year. Maybe I&#039;m missing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now the question Macdup asked in the last thread: Did EE play good enough to play against ATL?</p>
<p>	I say &#8216;Not really&#8217;, but you start him anyway. With Kovalchuk most likely in the lineup, I&#8217;m sketchy on starting Ersberg. Quick would be better against him, but I&#8217;d DEFINITELY prefer Quick against Tampa Bay. EE should play by default on Friday IMHO.</p>
<p>	SO Rich, I thought the Fro issues had died down. Apparantely not. Matthew Barry made some references to trade talk (Which I won&#8217;t mention because I have no clue if they are legit or not) with Fro that was nixed because the other team wanted a #1. I&#8217;m not looking for confirmation on that or anything, but I am beginning to wonder if things are heating up. Foxy spoke about Fro last week as comments were dying down (Rightfully so), You and Foxy (Who looked like he was standing on a box next to you) tonight bring up the talk again. I almost want to get this all over with early so it doesn&#8217;t affect us close to playoff time. It&#8217;s almost annoying at this point.</p>
<p>	As far as who should go, Martinez back to Manch when off IR. I&#8217;d trade Purcell and bring up Clune. Harrold can sit until needed. I&#8217;m just not seeing anything out of Purcell at all. Almost every time he drives, he&#8217;s knocked off the puck. I&#8217;m not seeing the skill as advertised. His dad&#8217;s moustache is rockin&#8217;, but it doesn&#8217;t score goals. If we keep him all year, he&#8217;ll end up like Moulson, released for nothing. We can&#8217;t send him back down and at this point, why would we. He&#8217;s just not cutting it. I&#8217;d like Terry Murray&#8217;s opinion on Purcell&#8217;s play so far this year. Maybe I&#8217;m missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: lakingsinsider.com @ 2012-05-22 14:59:53 -->
